auxiliary dataset
On the Powerfulness of Textual Outlier Exposure for Visual OoDDetection
Successful detection of Out-of-Distribution (OoD) data is becoming increasingly important to ensure safe deployment of neural networks. One of the main challenges in OoD detection is that neural networks output overconfident predictions on OoD data, make it difficult to determine OoD-ness of data solely based on their predictions. Outlier exposure addresses this issue by introducing an additional loss that encourages low-confidence predictions on OoD data during training. While outlier exposure has shown promising potential in improving OoD detection performance, all previous studies on outlier exposure have been limited to utilizing visual outliers.
Details
To keep experiments uniform, for all datasets (STL-10, CIFAR-10, and CIFAR-100) we used a train/val/test partitioning. In our experiments we compared FED with four baselines. For all baselines we tried different learning rates [0.1, 0.01, 0.001] and batch sizes [32, 64, 100]. For EnDD and EnDD + AUX, we used the same temperature, temperature annealing, and optimizer that was used in the original paper. For AMT, we tried different alphas [1e1, 1e3, 1e5] and kept the rest as the original paper.
Functional Ensemble Distillation
Bayesian models have many desirable properties, most notable is their ability to generalize from limited data and to properly estimate the uncertainty in their predictions. However, these benefits come at a steep computational cost as Bayesian inference, in most cases, is computationally intractable. One popular approach to alleviate this problem is using a Monte-Carlo estimation with an ensemble of models sampled from the posterior. However, this approach still comes at a significant computational cost, as one needs to store and run multiple models at test time. In this work, we investigate how to best distill an ensemble's predictions using an efficient model.
Extracting Training Data from Molecular Pre-trained Models
This work, for the first time, explores the risks of extracting private training molecular data from molecular pre-trained models. This task is nontrivial as the molecular pre-trained models are non-generative and exhibit a diversity of model architectures, which differs significantly from language and image models.